Implementation Plan | March 2026

Content Factory

AI-Powered Brand Content Pipeline

AI agent team gets an idea, researches it live, collaborates, and produces all content types for all platforms. Human approval via Slack. 130+ posts/month across 3 brands for ~$64/mo.

3 Brands 130+ Posts/Mo ~$64/Mo Quality Tier 2 Phases, 7 Waves, 36 Units
dokwallet doktransfers vesappsai
Scroll to explore

Content Factory — AI-Powered Brand Content Pipeline

Section 1: Overview

1.1 What Is Content Factory?

An AI-powered content pipeline for 3 brands. An agent team gets an idea, researches it live, collaborates, and produces all content types for all social media platforms. Human approval via Slack. Automatic publishing.

Phased approach: Phase 1 ships a working content pipeline with no centralized knowledge base — agents research live, collaborate, and produce. Phase 2 adds competitor intelligence, RAG knowledge base, and analytics feedback loops.

Three Brands:

Brand Domain Category Current Presence
dokwallet dokwallet.com Crypto wallet App Store + Play Store, basic social
doktransfers doktransfers.com File transfer Web app, minimal social
vesappsai vesappsai.com AI chat Web app, growing user base

Pipeline (Phase 1): Idea → Live research → Agent team produces content → Human approval via Slack → Publish to all platforms

Pipeline (Phase 2): Scrape competitors → Analyze patterns → Knowledge base → Enhanced ideation → Agent team → Approval → Publish → Analytics feedback

3
Brands
130+
Posts / Month
$64
Quality Tier / Mo
36
Implementation Units

1.2 Key Decisions

Topic Decision
Project name content-factory
Monorepo Yes, single Python repo
Platforms LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X/Twitter, TikTok, YouTube Shorts, branded blogs
Content types Post, blog, reel, story, short, video, image, carousel, thread, poll, infographic
Workflow engine n8n (scheduling/HITL/Slack) + CrewAI or ADK (agents)
Database (Phase 1) PostgreSQL 16 (plain JSONB, no extensions)
Database (Phase 2) PostgreSQL 16 (pgvector + Apache AGE)
Content calendar Postiz or mixpost
Batch execution Claude Code CLI batch mode

1.3 Content Types, Platform Specs & Production Cost

The factory produces all content types across all major platforms. Below is the full spec sheet with AI production cost per unit (Quality tier models).

Instagram

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
Feed Post (image + caption) 1080x1350 4:5 Caption: 2,200 chars $0.09 (1 image $0.055 + text ~$0.03)
Carousel 1080x1350 per slide 4:5 2-20 slides, 2,200 chars $0.39 (6 images $0.33 + text ~$0.06)
Story 1080x1920 9:16 15s per frame, 24h expiry $0.09 (1 image $0.055 + text ~$0.03)
Reel 1080x1920 9:16 15-90s, max 4GB $0.57 (30s video $0.21 Seedance + text ~$0.03 + TTS ~$0.00 + captions ~$0.03 + thumbnail $0.055 + assembly ~$0.20)
Reel (template) 1080x1920 9:16 15-90s $0.14 (3 images $0.055 + text ~$0.03 + music + MoviePy assembly)

LinkedIn

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
Text Post 3,000 chars $0.03 (text only, ~500 tokens out)
Image Post 1200x627 or 1080x1080 1.91:1 or 1:1 Caption: 3,000 chars, image <10MB $0.09 (1 image $0.055 + text ~$0.03)
Carousel / Document 1080x1080 per slide (PDF) 1:1 1-300 pages, max 100MB $0.48 (8 slides $0.055 + text ~$0.04)
Video Post 1920x1080 or 1080x1920 16:9 or 9:16 3s-10min, max 5GB $0.87 (30s video $0.21 + text ~$0.03 + TTS + thumbnail + assembly)
Article 1200x627 featured image 1.91:1 125,000 chars (~20K words) $0.26 (1500 words text ~$0.20 + 1 featured image $0.055)
Newsletter 1200x627 header 1.91:1 Same as article, sent to subscribers $0.26 (same as article)

Facebook

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
Feed Post (image) 1080x1350 4:5 Caption: 63,206 chars $0.09 (1 image + text)
Carousel 1080x1080 per card 1:1 2-10 cards $0.42 (6 images + text ~$0.06 + link per card)
Story 1080x1920 9:16 20s per frame, 24h expiry $0.09 (1 image + text overlay)
Reel 1080x1920 9:16 15-90s, max 4GB $0.57 (same as IG Reel)
Video Post 1280x720 min 16:9 or 9:16 Up to 240min, max 10GB $0.87 (30s AI video + text + assembly)

X / Twitter

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
Tweet (text only) 280 chars (free) / 25,000 (Premium) $0.01 (minimal tokens)
Tweet + Image 1600x900 or 1080x1080 16:9 or 1:1 Up to 4 images, 5MB each $0.09 (1 image + text)
Thread Up to 25 tweets, 280 chars each $0.06 (text only, ~5 tweets, ~$0.01 each)
Video Tweet 1920x1080 or 1080x1920 16:9 or 9:16 Up to 140s (free) / 4h (Premium) $0.57 (30s video + text)

TikTok

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
Short Video 1080x1920 9:16 15s-10min (up to 60min upload) $0.57 (30s AI video + text + captions)
Photo Carousel 1080x1920 9:16 4-35 slides $0.48 (8 images + text + music)
Story 1080x1920 9:16 15s, 24h expiry $0.09 (1 image + text overlay)

YouTube

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
Short 1080x1920 9:16 Up to 3min, max 60s recommended $0.57 (30s AI video + text + captions)
Standard Video 1920x1080 16:9 Up to 12h, max 256GB $3.50+ (3min AI video ~$2.50 + script ~$0.20 + TTS ~$0.10 + thumbnail + assembly)
Community Post 1080x1080 1:1 7,000 chars + image/poll $0.09 (image + text)

Pinterest

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
Standard Pin 1000x1500 2:3 Description: 500 chars, title: 100 chars $0.09 (1 image + text)
Idea Pin 1080x1920 per page 9:16 2-20 pages, mix of image/video $0.48 (8 images + text)
Video Pin 1000x1500 or 1080x1920 2:3 or 9:16 4s-15min $0.57 (30s video + text)

Blog (Ghost / WordPress)

Content Type Dimensions Aspect Ratio Duration / Limits AI Production Cost
SEO Article 1200x630 featured image 1.91:1 1000-2000 words, SEO meta $0.36 (text ~$0.25 + featured image $0.055 + SEO meta ~$0.05)
Long-form Article 1200x630 + inline images 1.91:1 2000-5000 words, 3-5 images $0.75 (text ~$0.40 + 5 images $0.28 + SEO ~$0.05)
Infographic 1080x3000+ ~1:3 tall Data visualization $0.30 (data research ~$0.10 + image generation ~$0.15 + text ~$0.05)

Cost Summary by Content Type (Quality Tier)

Content Type Cost What’s Included
Text-only post $0.01-0.03 LLM text generation, platform formatting
Image post $0.09 1 Flux Pro image + caption text
Carousel (6-8 slides) $0.39-0.48 Multiple images + text per slide
Story (image) $0.09 1 image + text overlay
Reel/Short (AI video, 30s) $0.57 Seedance 1.5 video + text + captions + thumbnail
Reel/Short (template, 30s) $0.14 3 images + MoviePy assembly + music
Thread (5 tweets) $0.06 Text only, multi-part
Blog article (SEO) $0.36 1500 words + featured image + SEO meta
Long-form blog (5 images) $0.75 3000 words + 5 images + SEO
Video post (30s AI) $0.87 AI video + script + TTS + thumbnail + assembly
LinkedIn article $0.26 1500 words + featured image
Infographic $0.30 Data research + tall image + text

Cost assumptions (Quality tier): Text via Claude Sonnet 4.6 (~$0.01/500 tokens out), Images via Flux Pro 1.1 ($0.055/image), Video via Seedance 1.5 no-audio ($0.21/8s clip), TTS via Google Cloud free tier, Assembly via MoviePy/FFmpeg (free). All costs are AI generation only — no infrastructure.

1.4 Volume & Output

Monthly output across 3 brands: 130+ posts/month

Format Count/month
LinkedIn posts + threads 40
Carousels (IG/FB/LI) 30
Blog articles 12
Reels / Shorts (IG/TikTok/YT) 30
Stories 18
Polls + Infographics 10

Section 2: Architecture

Server: Hetzner CPX41 — 8 shared vCPU, 16GB RAM, 240GB NVMe — ~$21/mo

Docker Compose — 6 containers:

Container RAM Purpose
app (FastAPI) 512MB–1.5GB All services as modules
postgres 1.5GB Document DB (Phase 1: JSONB only; Phase 2: +pgvector +AGE)
n8n 512MB Scheduling, Slack HITL, workflows
postiz or mixpost 512MB–1GB Content calendar UI
redis 128MB Required by n8n + Postiz
caddy 64MB Reverse proxy + auto HTTPS
Total ~4–5GB Fits easily on 16GB

Monthly cost: ~$26 (server $21 + backup $5)

Migration path to Fargate: 5–8 days effort when revenue justifies $300+/mo.

2.2 Alternative Deployments

Option Monthly Cost Notes
Hetzner VPS (recommended) ~$26 Best value, Docker Compose
AWS Fargate ~$300–420 Managed, follows vest-ai-cdk
GCP Cloud Run ~$105–115 Scale-to-zero
Hybrid VPS + Free Tiers ~$22–28 Risk: free tier expiry

VPS Provider Comparison (8 vCPU, 16GB)

Provider Price/mo
Hetzner CPX41 ~$21
Contabo ~$12–15
DigitalOcean ~$96
Vultr ~$96

2.3 Database Architecture

Phase 1: Simple PostgreSQL 16 — plain JSONB for content drafts, brand configs, publish logs, cost ledger. No vector/graph extensions needed.

Phase 2: Unified PostgreSQL 16 with extensions:

DB Role Solution Notes
Document DB PostgreSQL JSONB 90–95% of MongoDB for this use case
Vector DB pgvector extension Good for <500K vectors
Graph DB Apache AGE extension Cypher queries, content relationships
Object Storage S3 / Hetzner / R2 Generated media, templates, brand assets

Scale-up path: Split to dedicated FalkorDB (graph) + Qdrant (vector) when needed.

Section 3: AI Costs

3.1 Budget Tier (~$15/mo)

Phase Model Cost/mo
All LLM phases Gemini 2.0 Flash ~$2
Images (195) Flux Schnell ($0.015/img) ~$3
Video (24 reels) Template-based (MoviePy + FFmpeg) ~$0.24
TTS Google Cloud TTS free tier $0
Total ~$15

The quality tier uses the best model for each phase: fast/cheap models for routing and analysis, premium models for creative writing. Prompt caching (brand guidelines ~3K tokens, system prompts ~1.5K) saves an estimated $10–25/mo since cache reads cost 10% of input price.

Phase Model Cost/mo
Routing/decisions (650 calls) Gemini 2.0 Flash $0.12
Research agents Gemini 2.5 Flash $2–3
Ideation Claude Sonnet 4.6 $0.83
Writing Claude Sonnet 4.6 $8–10
Editing Claude Sonnet 4.6 $4–5
SEO/analytics Gemini 2.5 Flash $1–2
Image prompts Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.50
Images (195) Flux Pro 1.1 ($0.055/img) ~$5
Video (24 reels) Template + 6 AI (Seedance 1.5) ~$6
TTS Google Cloud TTS free tier $0
Total ~$38

3.3 Premium Tier (~$836/mo)

Phase Model Cost/mo
All LLM phases Claude Opus 4.6 $64
Images (195) Ideogram v3 Quality $18
Video (24 reels, 45s avg) Veo 3.1 4K + audio $655
TTS ElevenLabs Pro plan $99
Total ~$836

3.4 Scaling (Sublinear)

AI Cost vs Number of Brands

Scale Posts/mo AI Cost/mo
3 brands 130 ~$38
6 brands 260 ~$65
10 brands 430 ~$100
1000 posts 1000 ~$180

3.5 Grand Total Monthly

Monthly Cost by Tier ($)

Budget Quality Premium
Hetzner VPS + backup $26 $26 $26
AI costs $15 $38 $836
Monthly total ~$41 ~$64 ~$862

Section 4: Video Generation Benchmark

4.1 Benchmark Reference

Benchmarked against the northern_lights_iceland reel produced with neural-reels (Veo 2.0 via Vertex AI):

Spec Value
Model Veo 2.0 (veo-2.0-generate-001)
Scenes 7 clips, 8s each
Resolution 720x1280 (9:16 portrait)
FPS / Codec 24fps, H264
Final reel ~81s assembled, 13.3MB

4.2 Per-Clip Cost Comparison (8s, 720p, 9:16)

Model Per Clip Per Reel (7 clips) Audio Platform Quality Tier
Veo 2.0 (baseline) $3.40 $23.80 No Vertex AI High
Veo 3.1 Fast $1.20 $8.40 Yes Vertex AI Very High
Runway Gen-4.5 ~$1.00 $7.00 No Direct API Best (Elo #1)
Kling 3.0 ~$1.00 $7.00 No Direct API Very High (Elo #3)
Vidu Q3 $0.66 $4.62 Yes Direct/Novita High
Hailuo 02 Pro $0.64 $4.48 No fal.ai Very High (#2 benchmarks)
Seedance 1.5 Pro $0.41 $2.87 Yes (48kHz) fal.ai High
Runway Gen-4 Turbo $0.40 $2.80 No Direct API Very High
Wan 2.1 $0.40 $2.80 No fal.ai High (best open-source)
Hailuo 02 Std $0.36 $2.52 No fal.ai High
Pika 2.2 $0.32 $2.24 No fal.ai Good-High
LTX-2.3 Fast $0.32 $2.24 No fal.ai Good (open-source)
Seedance 1.5 (no audio) $0.21 $1.47 No fal.ai High
CogVideoX $0.20 $1.40 No fal.ai Below
LTX-Video $0.06 $0.42 No Replicate Lower

4.3 Seedance 2.0 — Status & Proxy Warning

Seedance 2.0 is geo-locked to mainland China (Jimeng/Doubao). International API launch indefinitely delayed due to copyright lawsuits from Disney, Netflix, Paramount, Sony, and Warner Bros.

Aspect Detail
Access Requires +86 phone + mainland China IP
API status Indefinitely delayed (was planned Feb 24, 2026)
Copyright issue MPA + major studios issued cease-and-desist over training data

Proxy services analysis: Most services advertising “Seedance 2.0” actually serve Seedance 1.5 Pro. Only Kie AI credibly had 2.0, but deactivated it.

Provider Actual Model Cost (8s video) Legitimate Recommended
Atlas Cloud 1.5 Pro (NOT 2.0) $0.18 Yes YES
fal.ai 1.5 Pro $0.41 (with audio) Yes YES
BytePlus (official) 1.5 Pro $0.49–0.99 Yes YES (enterprise)
Kie AI 2.0 (deactivated) $0.30 Uncertain NO
laozhang.ai Unverified $0.08 est. Uncertain NO

Recommendation: Do NOT rely on Seedance 2.0 proxies for commercial production. Use Seedance 1.5 Pro (legitimate, stable) or alternatives at similar quality: Veo 3.1 Fast, Kling 3.0, Hailuo 02 Pro. Seedance 2.0 quality is meaningfully better than 1.5 Pro (9/10 vs 7.5/10), but compliance risks (ToS violation, data privacy, service stability) make proxy access unsuitable for production.

4.4 Quality Rankings (Early 2026)

  1. Runway Gen-4.5 (Elo 1247) / Veo 3.1 (Elo 1226) / Kling 3.0 (Elo 1225)
  2. Seedance 2.0 / Sora 2 (9/10 quality — geo-locked to China, no international API)
  3. Hailuo 02 (#2 on Artificial Analysis benchmarks)
  4. Seedance 1.5 / Vidu Q3 / Pika 2.2
  5. Wan 2.5 (best open-source) / LTX-2.3

4.5 Video Strategy by Tier

Tier Approach Monthly (24 reels)
Budget Template-based (MoviePy + FFmpeg) ~$0.24
Quality Template + Seedance 1.5 or Hailuo 02 Std for hero content ~$5–15
Premium All AI-generated via Veo 3.1 or Runway Gen-4.5 ~$170–655

4.6 Template-Based vs AI-Generated

85–90% of business reels are template-based, not AI video generation:

Approach Cost/video Monthly (24) How
MoviePy + FFmpeg $0.01 $0.24 Images + text + music + transitions
Remotion Lambda $0.03 $0.72 React templates → MP4
ShortGPT $0.02–0.20 $0.50–5 Stock footage + TTS + overlays
Seedance 1.5 (no audio) $0.21 $5 AI video, good quality
Hailuo 02 Std $0.36 $8.64 AI video, high quality
Veo 3.1 4K $27/reel $655 Premium AI video

Section 5: Phase 1 — Content Production Pipeline

5.1 Phase 1 Overview

Goal: A working agent team that takes an idea, researches it live (web search, not RAG), collaborates, and produces finished content for all types and platforms. Human approval via Slack. Publish everywhere.

What’s in Phase 1: Agent team, all content types, all platforms, publishing, cost tracking, Slack approval.

What’s NOT in Phase 1: No competitor scraping, no centralized knowledge base/RAG, no analytics feedback loops, no competitor pattern analysis. Agents research each topic fresh from the web.

5.2 Agent Team (Phase 1)

Researcher

Live web research, facts, data, trends

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Writer

All content types, image prompts, video scripts

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Editor

Brand voice, quality, revision loop

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Router

Platform adaptation, specs, quality gates

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Media Producer

Images, videos, carousels, stories

Flux + Seedance APIs
Agent Role Model Notes
Researcher Live web research on topic, gathers facts/data/trends Gemini 2.5 Flash Web search tools, no RAG
Writer Generates all content: text, image prompts, video scripts, carousels Claude Sonnet 4.6 Platform-aware output
Editor Brand voice check, quality review, revisions (max 3 rounds) Claude Sonnet 4.6 Brand guidelines in system prompt
Router Adapts content to each platform’s specs, quality gates Gemini 2.0 Flash Character limits, image sizes, hashtags, CTAs
Media Producer Generates images (Flux), videos (Seedance/template), assembles carousels API calls Orchestrates media generation APIs

5.3 Data Flow (Phase 1)

Idea
Research
Generate
Edit
Approve
Publish
Idea (manual input or RSS/news trigger)
  → n8n triggers agent team
  → Researcher agent (web search, live research)
  → Writer agent (text, image prompts, video scripts)
  → Editor agent (brand voice, revision loop)
  → Router agent (adapts to each platform + content type)
  → n8n → Slack approval (approve/reject/revise)
  → Postiz/mixpost calendar → Scheduled publish
  → Publisher → LinkedIn / Facebook / Instagram / X / TikTok / YouTube / Blog

5.4 Services (Phase 1 — Single FastAPI App)

Module Function
common/ Brand config, platform specs, shared models, LLM client
ideation/ RSS/news ingestion, manual idea input API
generator/ Agent team (researcher + writer + editor + router + media producer)
publisher/ Platform posting (LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, X, TikTok, YouTube, Ghost)
analytics/ Cost tracking only (no engagement analytics yet)

5.5 Phase 1 Waves

Wave 1 — Foundation (units 1-5)

Unit Description Test
1 Repo scaffold src/ structure, pyproject.toml, Dockerfile, CLAUDE.md uv sync succeeds
2 Docker Compose FastAPI, PostgreSQL (plain JSONB), n8n, Redis, Caddy docker compose up healthy
3 PostgreSQL schema SQLAlchemy + Alembic: brands, ideas, drafts, publish_log, cost_ledger alembic upgrade head
4 Brand config YAML configs for 3 brands with Pydantic validation Unit tests pass
5 Common utilities LLM client (Claude + Gemini), platform specs, cost tracker Unit tests pass

Wave 2 — Agent Team + Media (units 6-10)

Unit Description Test
6 Researcher agent Web search + live research. Gemini 2.5 Flash Research for “crypto wallet security tips”
7 Writer agent All content types from research. Claude Sonnet 4.6 LinkedIn post draft generated
8 Editor agent Brand voice review, revision loop (max 3) Catches off-brand tone in test draft
9 Router agent Adapts content to platform specs Same idea → LinkedIn post + IG carousel + X thread
10 Media producer Flux Pro images, Seedance 1.5 video, carousel assembly Image + video generated

Wave 3 — Workflow + Publishing (units 11-17)

Unit Description Test
11 n8n approval Webhook → Slack → Approve/Reject/Revise. 24h timeout Slack buttons work
12 RSS + news RSSHub + newspaper4k: crypto/tech/AI feeds --fetch populates DB
13 LinkedIn publisher Official API: text, images, documents, articles Post on test account
14 Instagram publisher instagrapi: posts, carousels, stories, reels Post on test account
15 Facebook publisher Graph API: posts, images, videos Post on test page
16 X/Twitter publisher API v2: tweets, threads, images, polls Tweet on test account
17 Blog publisher Ghost CMS or static pages. SEO metadata Article published

Wave 4 — Calendar + Polish (units 18-22)

Unit Description Test
18 Postiz/mixpost Calendar scheduling, optimal times, multi-brand Post in calendar
19 Cost tracker Per-request LLM costs, daily/weekly/monthly per brand Cost report generated
20 TikTok publisher TikTok API: short videos, descriptions, hashtags Video on test TikTok
21 YouTube Shorts YouTube Data API v3: Shorts upload Short on test channel
22 Kill switch Slack /kill-post {id} → delete/unpublish Post removed

Phase 1 Dependency Graph

Phase 1
Content Production
Wave 1
Foundation
12345
Wave 2
Agent Team
678910
Wave 3
Publishing
11121314151617
Wave 4
Polish
1819202122
Wave 1 (1-5):   [scaffold] [docker] [schema] [brands] [utils]
                       ↓
Wave 2 (6-10):  [researcher] [writer] [editor] [router] [media-producer]
                       ↓
Wave 3 (11-17): [n8n-approval] [rss] [li-pub] [ig-pub] [fb-pub] [x-pub] [blog-pub]
                       ↓
Wave 4 (18-22): [calendar] [cost-tracker] [tiktok-pub] [yt-shorts-pub] [kill-switch]

Section 6: Phase 2 — Knowledge Base + Intelligence

6.1 Phase 2 Overview

Goal: Add competitor intelligence, centralized knowledge base (RAG), analytics feedback loops, and content performance optimization. Agents now learn from past content, competitors, and engagement data.

What Phase 2 adds:

6.2 Data Flow (Phase 2 additions in bold)

flowchart LR
  subgraph INGEST[" Data Ingestion "]
    direction TB
    IG["Instagram\nScraper"]
    LI["LinkedIn\nScraper"]
    FB["Facebook\nScraper"]
    RSS["RSS / News\nFeeds"]
  end
  subgraph DB[" PostgreSQL "]
    direction TB
    JSONB["JSONB\nDocuments"]
    VEC["pgvector\nEmbeddings"]
    GRAPH["Apache AGE\nGraph"]
  end
  subgraph AGENTS[" AI Agent Team "]
    direction TB
    RESEARCH["Researcher\n(Gemini 2.5 Flash)"]
    WRITER["Writer\n(Claude Sonnet)"]
    EDITOR["Editor\n(Claude Sonnet)"]
    ROUTER["Router\n(Gemini 2.0 Flash)"]
    MEDIA["Media Producer\n(Flux + Seedance)"]
    RESEARCH --> WRITER --> EDITOR
    ROUTER -.-> WRITER
    WRITER -.-> MEDIA
  end
  subgraph HITL[" Approval "]
    direction TB
    N8N["n8n\nWorkflow"]
    SLACK["Slack\nApprove / Reject"]
    N8N --> SLACK
    SLACK -->|Revise| N8N
  end
  subgraph PUBLISH[" Publish "]
    direction TB
    CAL["Postiz\nCalendar"]
    LI_PUB["LinkedIn"]
    IG_PUB["Instagram"]
    FB_PUB["Facebook"]
    X_PUB["X / Twitter"]
    TT_PUB["TikTok"]
    YT_PUB["YouTube"]
    BLOG["Blog"]
    CAL --> LI_PUB & IG_PUB & FB_PUB & X_PUB & TT_PUB & YT_PUB & BLOG
  end
  INGEST --> DB --> AGENTS --> HITL -->|Approved| PUBLISH
  PUBLISH -.->|Analytics| DB
**Scraper (n8n scheduled) → Competitor data → PostgreSQL (JSONB + pgvector)**
RSS/News (n8n scheduled) → Ideation agents → Content ideas ranked
                         → **Knowledge base: brand voice, competitor patterns, past winners**
                         → Agent team → Draft → Approval → Publish
**Analytics (n8n scheduled) → Engagement metrics → Performance feedback → Ideation**
**Weekly Slack report → Next week's ideas + last week's performance**

6.3 Phase 2 Waves

Wave 5 — Competitor Intelligence (units 23-27)

Unit Description Test
23 PostgreSQL extensions Add pgvector + Apache AGE. Migrate schema alembic upgrade head
24 Instagram scraper instaloader: posts, captions, hashtags, engagement --dry-run succeeds
25 LinkedIn scraper Posts, articles, engagement --dry-run succeeds
26 Facebook scraper Posts, reactions, shares --dry-run succeeds
27 X/TikTok scraper snscrape/TikTok API: posts, engagement, trending Scraper runs

Wave 6 — Knowledge Base + RAG (units 28-31)

Unit Description Test
28 Competitor analysis Pattern extraction via Gemini 2.0 Flash Patterns in DB
29 Knowledge/RAG service pgvector similarity search for agent context Query returns context
30 Enhanced researcher Upgrade: RAG + web search, competitor-aware Research includes competitor insights
31 Enhanced ideation Ranked ideas from trends + competitor gaps + past performance Ideas ranked with context

Wave 7 — Analytics + Optimization (units 32-36)

Unit Description Test
32 Performance analytics Engagement metrics from all platforms Metrics fetched
33 Weekly Slack report Sunday 6pm: ideas + performance per brand Report sent
34 SEO pipeline Keywords, meta tags, schema markup Meta tags generated
35 Content feedback loop Top-performing patterns → ideation weights Feedback influences ideation
36 A/B content variants 2-3 variants per piece, track performance Variants tracked

Phase 2 Dependency Graph

Phase 2
Knowledge + Intelligence
Wave 5
Competitors
2324252627
Wave 6
RAG + KB
28293031
Wave 7
Analytics
3233343536
Phase 1 complete
       ↓
Wave 5 (23-27): [pg-extensions] [ig-scraper] [li-scraper] [fb-scraper] [x-tiktok-scraper]
       ↓
Wave 6 (28-31): [competitor-analysis] [rag-service] [enhanced-researcher] [enhanced-ideation]
       ↓
Wave 7 (32-36): [analytics] [weekly-report] [seo] [feedback-loop] [ab-variants]

Section 7: Human-in-the-Loop

7.1 Approval Workflow (n8n + Slack)

No content is published without human approval:

  1. Generator creates draft → webhook triggers n8n
  2. n8n sends preview to brand Slack channel (#dokwallet-content, etc.)
  3. Manager clicks: Approve / Reject / Revise
  4. Approve → Postiz calendar → Publisher
  5. Revise → feedback to Editor agent → new draft → re-review
  6. 24h timeout → escalate to #content-factory-admin
  7. Weekly (Phase 2): Sunday 6pm — next week’s ideas + last week’s performance
  8. Emergency: /kill-post {id} Slack command

Section 8: Brands & Competitors

8.1 Brand Profiles

All competitors have active LinkedIn + Facebook + Instagram presence.

dokwallet (Crypto Wallet)

Competitor Website LinkedIn Why We Watch
MetaMask metamask.io MetaMask Market leader, sets the standard for wallet UX content
Exodus exodus.com Exodus Excellent educational content, multi-chain narrative
Phantom phantom.app Phantom Strong meme game, community engagement
ZenGo zengo.com ZenGo Security-first messaging, MPC explainers
Zerion zerion.io Zerion DeFi-native content, portfolio tracking angles

doktransfers (File Transfer)

Competitor Website LinkedIn Why We Watch
fromsmash fromsmash.com Smash Creative branding, “no size limit” positioning
wetransfer wetransfer.com WeTransfer Best-in-class brand storytelling, creative community
jumbomail jumbomail.me Jumbomail B2B messaging, enterprise file transfer use cases

vesappsai (AI Chat)

Competitor Website LinkedIn Why We Watch
Character.ai character.ai Character.AI Viral content strategy, personality-driven branding
Replika replika.com Replika Emotional connection angle, companion AI narrative

Section 9: Existing Repos

9.1 Reusable Components

Repo GitHub Reuse For Key Patterns
social-media-agent langchain-ai/social-media-agent Slack HITL + LinkedIn/Twitter posting LangGraph agent graph, Slack interactive buttons, OAuth
crewAI-examples crewAIInc/crewAI-examples Instagram Post, Content Creator crews Multi-agent definitions, task delegation, tool integration
neural-reels AymanKB/neural-reels ADK multi-agent video generation Google ADK architecture, Veo/Imagen/TTS tools, MoviePy
ALwrity AJaySRawat/ALwrity SEO pipeline, content generation Google Trends, SERP analysis, keyword clustering
agentic-rag-for-dummies pchunduri6/rag-demystified RAG retrieval pattern LangGraph + vector store, embedding pipeline
ai-knowledge-graph Local FalkorDB schema + populate Graph schema design, Cypher queries
postiz-app gitroomhq/postiz-app Content calendar, scheduling REST API, multi-account, media upload
mixpost inovector/mixpost Alternative scheduler Analytics, media library, workspace support
MoneyPrinterV2 FujiwaraChoki/MoneyPrinterV2 YouTube Shorts automation Video assembly, FFmpeg pipeline, batch generation
Auto_Social_Media_Content_Generator manoj-ch-12/Auto_Social_Media_Content_Generator Canva API + platform specs Canva Connect API, platform-specific sizing

Section 10: Premium Models (March 2026)

10.1 Text Models

Model Input/Output per MTok
Claude Opus 4.6 $5 / $25
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $2–4 / $12–18
GPT-5 $1.25 / $10

10.2 Image Models

Model Cost per Image
Ideogram v3 $0.09
Flux Kontext Max $0.08/MP
Imagen 4 $0.02–0.06
Nano Banana 2 $0.04

10.3 Video Models — Cloud API

Model Provider Cost/sec Resolution Audio API
Veo 3.1 Google $0.15–0.60 Up to 4K Built-in Vertex AI
Runway Gen-4.5 Runway ~$0.50 1080p No Runway API
Kling 3.0 Kuaishou ~$0.13 1080p No Kling API
Seedance 1.5 Pro ByteDance ~$0.05 720p Yes (48kHz) fal.ai
Hailuo 02 MiniMax ~$0.04–0.08 720p–1080p No fal.ai
Pika 2.2 Pika ~$0.04 1080p No fal.ai
Wan 2.1 Alibaba ~$0.05 720p No fal.ai
Vidu Q3 Shengshu ~$0.08 1080p Yes Vidu API

10.4 Video Models — Self-Hosted / Open Source

Model License Min VRAM Rec. VRAM 720p 9:16 8s Gen Time (H100) Self-hosted Cost Link
Wan2.1-14B Apache 2.0 40 GB 80 GB Yes ~450s (~7.5 min) $0.39–0.67/video GitHub
Wan2.1-1.3B Apache 2.0 8 GB 24 GB Unstable N/A (480p only) $0.01–0.02/video GitHub
CogVideoX-5B Apache 2.0 16 GB 24 GB Yes ~60s $0.017–0.046/video GitHub
LTX-2.3 Open 12 GB 32 GB Yes ~120–180s est. $0.008–0.026/video GitHub
HunyuanVideo v1.5 Open 14 GB 80 GB Yes ~30–40s (optimized) $0.026–0.11/video GitHub
Open-Sora 1.2 Apache 2.0 24 GB 80 GB+ Yes ~120–180s est. $0.01–0.03/video GitHub
Mochi 1 Apache 2.0 22 GB 60 GB No (480p max) N/A $0.02–0.05/video GitHub
Seaweed-7B N/A ~40 GB ~40 GB Yes (paper) Real-time (claimed) Weights NOT released arXiv

Key findings: RTX 4090 (24GB) can only run CogVideoX-5B, LTX-2.3, and HunyuanVideo v1.5 (with offloading) at 720p. Wan2.1-14B and HunyuanVideo full require A100 80GB or H100. Seaweed-7B (the model behind Seedance) weights are not publicly available — self-hosting is not possible.

GPU Requirements Summary

GPU VRAM Can Run Price/hr (cheapest)
RTX 3090 24 GB CogVideoX-5B, LTX-2.3, Wan2.1-1.3B $0.09/hr (Vast.ai)
RTX 4090 24 GB CogVideoX-5B, LTX-2.3, HunyuanVideo v1.5 (offload) $0.20/hr (RunPod spot)
L40S 48 GB All above + HunyuanVideo v1.5 native $0.31/hr (Vast.ai)
A100 80GB 80 GB All models including Wan2.1-14B $0.67/hr (Vast.ai)
H100 80GB 80 GB All models, fastest generation $1.50/hr (RunPod spot)

Self-Hosting Cost Per Video (Best Providers)

Model GPU Gen Time Provider Cost/Video
LTX-2.3 RTX 3090 ~5 min Vast.ai ($0.09/hr) $0.008
CogVideoX-5B RTX 4090 ~3 min RunPod ($0.34/hr) $0.017
HunyuanVideo v1.5 H100 ~1 min (optimized) Vast.ai ($1.55/hr) $0.026
Wan2.1-14B H100 ~15 min Vast.ai ($1.55/hr) $0.39

Self-Hosting vs API Break-Even

Model API Cost/Video Best Self-Host Savings Worth Self-Hosting?
LTX-2.3 $0.32 (fal.ai) $0.008 97% Yes, at 5+ videos/day
CogVideoX-5B $0.20 (fal.ai) $0.017 91% Yes, at 10+ videos/day
Wan2.1-14B $0.40 (fal.ai) $0.39 ~0% No — API is competitive
HunyuanVideo N/A (limited API) $0.026 N/A Best at scale (requires H100 optimization stack)

Dedicated Server Option (Hetzner)

Server GPU VRAM Monthly Models Supported Cost/Video (utilized)
GEX44 RTX 4000 SFF Ada 20 GB ~$204/mo LTX-2.3, CogVideoX-5B (quantized) ~$0.014
GEX131 RTX PRO 6000 96 GB ~$989/mo All models ~$0.023–0.11

Self-hosting economics: For 24 reels/month, API is more cost-effective. Self-hosting breaks even at ~100+ videos/day (LTX-2.3 on cheap GPUs) or when using HunyuanVideo with full optimization stack on H100. Hetzner dedicated is best for continuous workloads — GEX44 at $204/mo can produce ~14,400 videos/month at $0.014 each. Note: Hetzner GPU prices rising ~30-37% from April 2026.

10.5 TTS Models

Model Cost Quality Link
ElevenLabs $99/mo Pro Best quality, voice cloning elevenlabs.io
OpenAI TTS-1-HD $15/1M chars Very good, 6 voices platform.openai.com
Google Cloud TTS Free tier (4M chars/mo) Good, many languages cloud.google.com/text-to-speech
Coqui XTTS v2 Free / open source Good, voice cloning github.com/coqui-ai/TTS

Section 11: Risks & Mitigation

11.1 Risk Matrix

Risk Likelihood Mitigation
Instagram account bans High Residential proxies, rate limits, warm-up, official API
LinkedIn API approval delays Medium Apply Week 1, manual posting via Postiz
Content quality / brand safety Medium Mandatory human approval, brand voice calibration
Scraper breakage (Phase 2) High Multiple fallbacks, 48h alerts, degrade to RSS
VPS single point of failure Medium Automated backups (restic → object storage)
Multi-model API dependency Low–Med Fallback models per phase
Platform T&C violations Medium Official APIs where possible
Video generation cost spikes Low Default to template-based, AI video only for hero content